Here is a general question about Worms, Trojans and Virus's? Why hasn't there ever been one that simply deletes peoples porn? it seems like that would be the end of civilization.

Suddenly the internet has no porn and neither do you.

>>46262167
>simply deletes peoples porn
We don't go there, Porn is peoples lives it makes the world go round.

>>46262167
Even the blackest hat respects our right to fap

>>46262167
too specialised. how do you programmatically differentiate porn from other pictures or videos?

>>46262230
luckily that can't be done.

>>46262230
Too much skin tone?

How did they go from the beautiful 128k to that monstrosity?

>>46262298
I wouldn't mind buying one of those, hard to find blank floppys.

>>46262329
>mfw I have like 300 empty floppies in the basement from my mother's job since they don't use them anymore
What should I do with them?

>>46262226
>Even the blackest hat respects our right to fap
This. Don't fuck with pron

>>46262167
A global virus which indiscriminately destroys image files on every database and home system it touches?

>>46262605
If i knew you outside of 4chan i'd put my name on a blank check and give it to you.

>>46262167
I hope you're kidding op, you cannot define porn from non-porn using software, I mean it is technically possible if you give parameters like skin colors in videos or moaning in the audio, but it would still require a botnet for every file that needs to be analyzed... but what's the point of deleting pr0n besides pissing people off? You need to be a uber bigot to waste this many resources and time just for deleting maybe 0,01% of the total internet porn, before the anti-viruses get updated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pn4kZyqVRU

Even if the world wide supply of internet porn was suddenly deleted, there are backups on disks and cd's and plus we can always make more its not that hard really..

>>46262605
You can get about 35 - 25 for a working disk and 12 for a non working on ebay sometimes.

>>46262270
some "feature" detection algorithms

>>46262167
New porn is constantly getting created and uploaded, so you'd have to infect every porn uploader to fully deprive someone of porn. If you had the power to do that why not do something more useful like get rid of all video streaming sites and start your own saying your immune to hackers

>>46262766
Actually since most people(idiots) categorize and seperate their porn from regular files it would be quite easy to make a file searcher hat looks for obvious folders, even easier when you account for obvious file names containing keywords.

Why? Why does anyone make viruses. For the fuck of it.

I had an encryption virus that encrypted all my porn.

I just redownloaded it.

Whats the point if there is still porn on physical media worldwide. Besides, its not like people cant make more porn.

>>46263593
Maybe back in the day, but now, most all malware is written because people want to make money, or steal some other kind of valuable.

There are less and less "troll" malware.

Its definitely possible though, and I would certainly lmfao my fucking ass off if someone made that.

>>46263593
>for the fuck of it
I would rather make something that turns a cluster of machines into bitcoin miners. Or steals their credit card info. Or injects ads into webpages they visit.

You know...things that will earn me money.

>>46262907
Bull shit, I've got like 100 verified working disks, no way I can get that much

All this talk of detecting nudity or skin tones. Meanwhile all of us sick fucks with weird fetishes would get off scott free.

>>46263993
What kind?

>>46264154
Whaddya got?

>make a porn/not porn website where people decide if a picture is porn or not porn
>if it is categorized as porn, it will be recorded in the database.
>virus crosschecks every picture with the database. if a match is found then it will delete it.

a slow acting virus, though.

>>46264522
You dont even have to pay people to do this. just say it's in the name of god and ridding the world of porn

soccer moms would jump on this shit.

>>46264549
I love the idea of tricking super-religious soccer Moms into watching hardcore pornography.

>>46262167
Using C2+ with only one drive?
Arrgh!

>>46262226
this. also the blackest hat watches the most porn.

>>46262907
Seriously?
What the fuck?
I've got a bunch of old floppies somewhere.

what is porn? data. how does a program distinguish porn from other data? it can't
But yeah all those viruses that format your hard drive, well, they delete the porn
>hurr durr they don't, they just rewrite the partition sector
alright yes they do

>>46262167
Even the supreme court couldn't unanimously agree on what constitutes porn.

>>46262167
The virus would need access to a database full of porn to differentiate porn from non-porn.

>>46262167
Because if you found a way to reliably detect porn vs. noporn you'd be doing something a hell of a lot more productive/lucrative than writing a prank virus.

>>46268543
If only there were internet accessible databases of porn. Oh, but they would never put porn on the internet!

>>46264154
tiles.

One thing I've been wanting to write is a skin-tone detector for images.
Maybe with some vague humanoid shape function too. Although for some images humanoid shape will not help you.

As a porn filter- ever thought about just doing it by filename?
You could delete a lot of porn that way. Trawl empornium or something for a list of keywords to find, and delete everything that matches certain filename types. Like different pornsites name their files differently, and if you can find regex matches you could reasonably assume it was porn.
Or if it just has 'fuck' or 'pussy' in it then you could pretty much assume it was porn.
A list of pornstar names would help too.

>>46262230
This.

You would have to use some kind of machine learning technique to get a program to differentiate between a porn file and a non-porn file. It would probably take a massive amount of computing power. It would need to analyze audio and video. It'd have to detect nude bodies engaging in intercourse. And even then it might get confused with different kinds of porn.

1st step: you would need a botnet. It would have to be very reliable with thousands if not millions of nodes.

2nd step: The combined resources from the botnet would need to be used for recon. At this phase the program needs to analyze a particularly large dataset of porn videos and pictures. This is where the program "learns" what porn is.

3rd step: Testing. The program must be tested against a large database of porn. It should successfully identify porn videos and images within a reasonable margin of error.

4th step: All you have so far is a program that identifies porn. You now need to write a worm that can infect multiple platforms. You have to research different points of entry and exploits.

5th step: Testing. Test your points of entry/exploits. Test against different virus scanners.

6th step: Strengthen malware against defenses using knowledge from step 5.

7th step: Deployment.

All in all this would take years to develop. It would need a huge team and lots of money. This is on the same scale as stuxnet. It will never happen.

>>46269122

Just ask google to lend you their chrome botnet

>>46269122
>>46262230

Here's a proposed solution:

1. Do a reverse image search and find the source of the picture.

2. Check if the websites that tend to post this picture are listed by net-nanny, is filtered by sfw google searches, and other related adult filters.

3. Using the results from #2, use a machine learning algorithm to apply weights to each technique and classify into porn or not porn.

4. Realize that a virus that deletes all pictures and videos from a person's computer will also delete all the porn from their computer and disregard 1 through 3 as a fun, but educational way to learning about machine learning.

>>46269291
That's actually pretty good but if we're talking about deleting ALL porn then I'd use your solution plus the machine learning solution. Have to be thorough. In my mind, the main obstacle is the money and resources needed to get this off the ground.

It would be hilarious to see people bitching about their missing porn though. I can only imagine what the dicks on Fox News would say.

>>46268893
I was thinking about that guy too.

Have you been hanging out on /qa/ like me?

>>46269122
just fucking delete everything, its like 5 or 6 lines, you can even make it fall from the users folder so you just focus on personal documents and can fuck everything up faster; and instead of deleting truncate, its easier, faster, and less obvious.
making so much of a fuss to look for porn makes it weaker, there is like 100 ways for it not to work

>>46262230
voice is easier to recognise. it has the pattern, you know, ohhh ahhh ohhh

>>46262167
and how would you tell if a file is porn?

>>46269122
Or just have your malware monitor the ammount of use a video file gets, opend more than once, always closed after up to10(?) minutes, several times a month or week?.
Its porn.

>>46268543
It could instead be supplied with parameters describing porn well enough to procedurally generate vast quantities of porn automatically if used differently.